A finalist from Naomi Robbins Bad Graph Contest, May 2012 |
The next time a Hillbot tells you Hillary won the popular vote and should be President, show them this... pic.twitter.com/XSRXoSu3Ie— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) November 13, 2016
.@mitchellvii This has to be the stupidest chart I've ever seen. It suggests that 306 votes are five times as many as 60+ million.— (((Yastreblyansky))) (@Yastreblyansky) November 13, 2016
.@mitchellvii Here's an accurate version of your chart using projections from Atlantic https://t.co/MV07b3Xn7c pic.twitter.com/W7RUjqhdsE— (((Yastreblyansky))) (@Yastreblyansky) November 13, 2016
Not that it ultimately makes any more sense than Bill's—electoral votes and popular votes simply don't belong in the same chart—but at least it doesn't tell any lies.
And
.@realDonaldTrump Yes, continually pretending you were a serious candidate until it was too late @nytimes— (((Yastreblyansky))) (@Yastreblyansky) November 13, 2016
.@realDonaldTrump Yes, allowing @maureendowd to emit column after column of hero worship before she realized you're a psychopath @nytimes— (((Yastreblyansky))) (@Yastreblyansky) November 13, 2016
.@realDonaldTrump Yes, equating two or three unwise @HillaryClinton Clinton decisions to your lifetime of fraud and abuse @nytimes— (((Yastreblyansky))) (@Yastreblyansky) November 13, 2016
.@realDonaldTrump Yes, for refusing to call you a liar until it was too late @nytimes— (((Yastreblyansky))) (@Yastreblyansky) November 13, 2016
.@realDonaldTrump but I'm keeping my subscription anyway @nytimes— (((Yastreblyansky))) (@Yastreblyansky) November 13, 2016
@realDonaldTrump because at its worst it's a million times more professional than you, von Clownstick @nytimes— (((Yastreblyansky))) (@Yastreblyansky) November 13, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment