![]() |
| I ain't saying it ain't pretty. Via. |
Those are the words. But the message, to farmers happy to demand price supports, is "if you vote for my opponent he'll give the money to people you don't like". It's a political principle, not an economic one, and can be overridden in a particular election. https://t.co/sNWVfsVHzN
— Yask4Mask (@Yastreblyansky) December 29, 2020
I wasn't even thinking about anything in particular when I posted this, but today on the radio the Covid version of this came up: as congresspeople continue to to debate over the best way of bribing their better-off constituents to put up with relief money going to the worse-off, it turns out that the nation's big-scale farmers have been collecting money they didn't need all along, with the bigger ones hogging the handouts:
Congress approved about $35 billion in emergency aid to farmers, which came on top of roughly $10 billion in traditional farm subsidies that were already in place. In addition, farmers were able to tap billions of dollars in funding from the Paycheck Protection Program.

