Tomb of the great 14th-century poet Hafez in the city of Shiraz, famous until the Islamic Revolution for its wine. Photo by Ondřej Žváček, via Wikipedia. |
It may not look as if my plan for Trump not to start a war with Iran is working out so far. I'm not so sure what I want to say about it, but there are a bunch of kind of short-breathed ideas I can pass on.
The first thing I thought of that other people didn't seem to be thinking about was the market movement that followed the killing of Qassem Soleimani:
Bet somebody who knows somebody did a big short today https://t.co/TYFsc53ZAD— Yastreblyansky (@Yastreblyansky) January 3, 2020
More plausibly a group. Profits on some of these lurches (usually Trump talking the market up) can mount up toward $2 billion https://t.co/rLdmODxA75— Yastreblyansky (@Yastreblyansky) January 3, 2020
And then I was answering questions:So what did they tell their brokers? whoever went long on oil futures made a nice little bundle. https://t.co/IL1h1qHce5— Yastreblyansky (@Yastreblyansky) January 4, 2020
so “brink of war” is fiction because we’re already at war? https://t.co/dmRv0Z11ve— John Harwood (@JohnJHarwood) January 3, 2020
Clearly the only way to deal with someone with a total disregard for the laws of war is to blow him away with a surprise drone at the airport when he's waiting for his ride to the hotel.No, that's only the Constitution. The law of war is the stuff the refs would do if there were any refs. pic.twitter.com/5m4HmHzCqu— Yastreblyansky (@Yastreblyansky) January 3, 2020
Apparently we've decided that Iraq doesn't exist. We've requisitioned it as a temporary battlefield so we can have our war with Iran without going there, which would be all kinds of inconvenient. Iraqi prime minister is pretty pissed off, but it's not clear what he can do.— Yastreblyansky (@Yastreblyansky) January 3, 2020
And as I've been hearing a lot on the radio, forced to choose between the US and Iran, Iraq will always go with Iran, because they live next door and are never going to move out.Apparently we've decided that Iraq doesn't exist. We've requisitioned it as a temporary battlefield so we can have our war with Iran without going there, which would be all kinds of inconvenient. Iraqi prime minister is pretty pissed off, but it's not clear what he can do.— Yastreblyansky (@Yastreblyansky) January 3, 2020
So all over Iraq, the demonstrators who have spent months protesting Iranian influence on the Baghdad government are now denouncing the US as well
BAGHDAD — American oil workers were fleeing Iraq on Friday, as fears grew of war between the United States and Iran. At sermons in the Shiite holy city of Karbala, worshipers chanted, “Death to America!”
And in Tahrir Square in central Baghdad, where antigovernment protesters have gathered for months, a banner went up with a pointed message to both Iran and the United States: “Keep your conflicts away from Iraq.”while the government debates throwing the Americans out altogether
Iraq's National Security Council suggested that Baghdad could ask the Washington to withdraw troops from the country on the heels of a U.S. airstrike in the capital Baghdad that killed a senior commander of the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) and another from the Iraqi Hashd al-Shaabi group.
The council in a meeting on Friday chaired by Iraq's Prime Minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi discussed a U.S. airstrike that killed Qasem Soleimani, commander of the IRGC Quds Forces, and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, vice head of Hashd al-Shaabi group, or Popular Mobilization Units (PMU).
Condemning the killing, the council declared that the attack violated the country's sovereignty.
It said the U.S. strike had transgressed the conditions for the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq, calling on the country's parliament to hold an emergency session on the matter to make a decision on whether to put an end to the U.S. military presence in the country.
Abdul-Mahdi also called on lawmakers to take legislative measures "to safeguard Iraq's dignity, security and sovereignty".Kirsten Fontenrose at The Atlantic Council says this would be a great deal for Trump
The biggest favor the Iraqi Parliament can do for US President Donald J. Trump right now is to vote to evict the United States from Iraq. The US president has been clear on his preference for drawing down the US presence in the region rather than beefing it up. Right now, he is asking his advisers why the United States should stay in Iraq, where the two stated missions are to train the Iraqi Security Forces and conduct counterterrorism operations.
But I think that's overreading the degree to which Trump has a policy intention as opposed to a campaign slogan. His actions over the past three years have shown him doubling the number of US troops in the region, moving them out of Russia's or Turkey's way on request but never actually moving them out, and mostly interested in "taking the oil" and bragging about being better than Obama. Successfully withdrawing troops from an unwinnable position in Syria might have looked better than Obama to a lot of people, but withdrawing troops from the theater of the war he just started with Iran looks like losing a war.
On New Year's Eve he threatened Iran with a swift and total defeat if they started a war, prior to starting one himself the next day:
Q Mr. President, do you foresee going to war with Iran?
THE PRESIDENT: I don’t think that would be a good idea for Iran. It wouldn’t last very long. Do I want to? No. I want to have peace. I like peace. And Iran should want peace more than anybody. So I don’t see that happening. No, I don’t think Iran would want that to happen. It would go very quickly.Iran wouldn't mind at all watching the Americans get thrown out by the Iraqi parliament. Speaking of swift and total,
— Yastreblyansky (@Yastreblyansky) January 3, 2020
Also, if Trump wants to defeat bad people, such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, he needs to stop doing everything he can to destroy their enemies:
Opposing IRGC doesn't mean reckless gestures that have no effect other than to make US look like "the real terrorists", bring together Iran and Iraqi populations in rage against US, weaken reform forces in both countries, and further encourage Iran to restart nuclear program.— Yastreblyansky (@Yastreblyansky) January 3, 2020
If Trump really opposed IRGC he'd have remained in JCPOA, tentatively lifted some sanctions on Iran consumers (not officials), and negotiated with Rouhani on reducing Iran's bad behavior in region. Instead he's done everything possible to give them absolute power.— Yastreblyansky (@Yastreblyansky) January 3, 2020
Nothing urgent about the following sequence, but I thought it did a good job of laying out something that isn't well understood by everybody: when you've discovered that thing that George W. Bush didn't know in 2002 (that Sunni Muslims have beef with Shi'a Muslims), you haven't discovered the whole thing:
It certainly wasn't established to combat Shi'a. It responded in first place to communism in Afghanistan. But its first big project was against fellow Sunnis: Saddam Hussein invading Kuwait and Saudi monarchy inviting US troops to defend them against Saddam pic.twitter.com/0yRVq42Z5A— Yastreblyansky (@Yastreblyansky) January 4, 2020
But they absolutely did remain hostile to Saudi monarchy, while getting funding from rebellious Saudi royals, in opposition to Saudi relationship with US, and Bin Laden's feud with them is what drove him to Sudan and then Afghanistan. pic.twitter.com/koY7az110N— Yastreblyansky (@Yastreblyansky) January 4, 2020
Iran often seems to be trying to construct a Shi'ite empire as it backs Shi'ite clients in Iraq and Afghanistan and Lebanon and Shi'a-related sects in Syria (Alawite) and Yemen (Zaydi) but they also support Sunnis in Palestine.— Yastreblyansky (@Yastreblyansky) January 4, 2020
Tl;dr it's always more complicated than you thought. Unless it's something a Republican said, in which case it could be less complicated.
Escalation is a special kind of de-escalation https://t.co/pWuuwX8HZN— Yastreblyansky (@Yastreblyansky) January 3, 2020
No comments:
Post a Comment