 |
| Tucker and Viktor on Monday, photo by the Office of the Hungarian Prime Minister, via The New York Times. |
Not how the old saying goes, but if you have a Hungarian for a friend, you might want to know who his other friends are.
I don't know to what extent readers are following the adventures of the wingnut
brethren in Hungary, where Rod Dreher of The American Conservative has been
serving as a visiting fellow of the Danube Institute since spring (his
substack
says he went 17 April, and was about to return to the US when he last posted
on 4 August, but he's also traveled around a bit in France, Spain, Romania,
and Poland, I think), exuding enthusiasm for the illiberalism of Prime
Minister Viktor Orbán and his Fidesz Party, one of the politicians who emerged
from the velvet revolutions of 1989, a more or less conventional, pro-Western
though very conservative, leader in his first premiership from 1998 to 2002
and an increasingly authoritarian one in his second, beginning 2010, during
which he has battled immigrants (especially Muslim ones), LBGTQ+ Hungarians
(that's important to Rod, of course), press freedom, and George Soros and his
Open Society Institute (the Soros Foundation gave him a scholarship to Oxford
in 1989, but he returned to Hungary to run for Parliament less than a year
after starting).
On the press freedom, Rod rodsplains, in a
post
datelined Ljubljana (note how, for evidence, he cites himself, talking to an
anonymous Slovene, reporting the authority of some anonymous Magyars without
explaining what makes them authorities):
I mentioned to a conservative writer here that a couple of Hungarians told
me that if Orban had not engineered the takeover of a number of Hungarian
press titles by his friends and allies, there would be no conservative media
presence at all in Hungary — this, even though conservative voters are a
majority. Whenever you hear people on the Left demanding government
intervention to guarantee “equity” — meaning equal outcomes [if I ever hear it, but I haven't so far, though I've heard talk
about reviving the FCC Fairness Doctrine of 1949-87 requiring individual
broadcasters to represent a range of views] — remind them that that is pretty much what Viktor Orban did with
the Hungarian media landscape. I should say that I have serious misgivings
[sure, Rod, that's why you're defending it] about the media operation
Orban pulled off, but the de facto monopoly the Left has on the media,
especially in a small country like Hungary, tempers my criticism. Orban is
far more realistic about the world people on the Right actually live in, I
think.