Showing posts with label 1%. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1%. Show all posts

Thursday, July 4, 2013

Welcome to the working class, Greg

Image via Steve Lovelace.
We were speculating about whether bold defender of the 1% Gregory Mankiw actually belongs to the 1%. Looks like the answer may be yes and no. Krugman, via Atrios:
Cengage Learning Inc. filed for bankruptcy protection more than five years after a buyout led by Apax Partners LLP left the textbook publisher with about $5.8 billion in debt.

Greg Mankiw, a Harvard University professor who advised Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney is owed $1.6 million in royalties, according to the bankruptcy filing.

Sunday, June 16, 2013

Defense of the 1%

Image of a conservative economist, from The Century Foundation.

Greg Mankiw, President W's chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors, tackles some philosophical issues in defense of the 1% (Via Chris Bertram at Crooked Timber). It's one of the most transparently stupid things I've read lately, and that's saying a lot.

Simple falsehood
the intergenerational transmission of income has many causes beyond unequal opportunity. In particular, parents and children share genes, a fact that would lead to intergenerational persistence in income even in a world of [jump]

Sunday, July 22, 2012

1% problem

Sometimes when my daughter realizes that she is on the point of getting seriously upset about something monumentally trivial, she smiles brightly and says, "White girl problem!"

Which I like very much, also in the variation I've overheard a couple of times, "First-world problem."

How is one to respond to the story in today's Times headlined,

What to Tell the Children About Their Inheritance and When

For the rest of us, inheritors seem like a democracy’s version of royalty: born into a world of privilege we would love to know. Yet the inheritors I spoke to said they were ill equipped to handle the windfall and found that it quickly made them feel separate from their peers.
For example,
Jason Franklin, now 32, said he received a call from his grandfather’s secretary asking if he wanted to serve on the board of the family foundation. He was 21 at the time, and up until that point, he said he thought his parents were just affluent professionals like his friends’ parents. The invitation prompted questions.
“If your family has enough money to create a family foundation, that means you have to ask about issues of wealth,” said Mr. Franklin, who works for a philanthropic consultancy. “It caused me to really pause. The reaction I was getting from my friends — it was isolating and confusing.”
So he had to go out and buy some new friends, right away, and they didn't have any in the right sizes. No, that's mean. Similarly,
When Naomi Sobel learned at 20 that she would receive a large inheritance, she said she knew it was a lot of money, and for her, too, it raised questions about a house: would it be enough to buy one? She laughs at this today, since it would have paid for many, many homes.
“I have enough money that I don’t ever have to work,” said Ms. Sobel, now 28.
Heh heh indeed, that's a scream.

Luckily, there are consultants to help you through it all, as well as a book, by Roy Williams and Vic Preisser, Preparing Heirs: Five Steps to a Successful Transition of Family Wealth and Values (Robert Reed Publishers, 2003). Or there are special therapists, according to Mother Jones, "wealth psychologists", who can assist in pulling you through.

And for the rest of you, sleep, well, adding yet another to the list of problems you don't expect to have.
Photo from The L Magazine.

Saturday, April 14, 2012

Demimonde


In Lille, they say, Dominique Strauss-Kahn couldn't tell the difference between a naked prostitute and "any other naked woman". He clearly expects to see naked women hanging around, waiting for a glimpse of him, and also clearly doesn't habitually ask them about their occupations. In New York, of course, clothes didn't help either; he couldn't tell the difference between a prostitute and a chambermaid. It's a whole different world, ain't it, in the 1%.