[in progress]
In 505 B.C.E. or thereabouts, the traveling philosopher Kong Qiu, whom we know as Confucius, made a trip to the state of Wei, in the plain to the east of present-day Shanxi, apparently in search of a government job with Duke Ling. The Analects report that one of his favorite disciples, Zhong You, called Zilu, said to him: "The Lord of Wei wants you to come and lead his government—what would you do first?"
"Definitely," replied the Master, "I would rectify all the names."
"That would be a pretty indirect approach!" said Zilu. "Why?"
"What a bumpkin you are, You!" said the Master. "When a junzi doesn’t understand a subject he should keep his mouth shut. If the names are not right, then what is said will not correspond to anything; if what is said does not correspond, then official business will not be carried out. If business is not carried out, ritual and music will not thrive; if ritual and music do not thrive, the laws and penalties will be off the mark; if laws and penalties are off the mark, then the people will not know what to do. This is why a junzi uses a name only in order to say something, and says something only in order to get something done; he doesn’t say things thoughtlessly, that’s all there is to it."
For anybody that thinks it's fun, here is the text from Analects XIII/3 in simplified characters (honesty compels me to add that I know how to play with Chinese text but can't actually read it):
子路曰：“衛君 待子而為政，子將奚先？”子曰：“必也正名乎！”子路曰：“有是哉，子之迂也！奚其正？”子曰：“野哉由也！君子於其所不知，蓋闕如也。名 不正，則言不順；言不順，則事不成；事不成，則禮樂不興；禮樂不興，則刑罰不中；刑罰不中，則民無所措手足。故君子名之必可言也，言之必可行也。君子於其 言，無所苟而已矣。”
In 505 B.C.E. or thereabouts, the traveling philosopher Kong Qiu, whom we know as Confucius, made a trip to the state of Wei, in the plain to the east of present-day Shanxi, apparently in search of a government job with Duke Ling. The Analects report that one of his favorite disciples, Zhong You, called Zilu, said to him: "The Lord of Wei wants you to come and lead his government—what would you do first?"
"Definitely," replied the Master, "I would rectify all the names."
"That would be a pretty indirect approach!" said Zilu. "Why?"
"What a bumpkin you are, You!" said the Master. "When a junzi doesn’t understand a subject he should keep his mouth shut. If the names are not right, then what is said will not correspond to anything; if what is said does not correspond, then official business will not be carried out. If business is not carried out, ritual and music will not thrive; if ritual and music do not thrive, the laws and penalties will be off the mark; if laws and penalties are off the mark, then the people will not know what to do. This is why a junzi uses a name only in order to say something, and says something only in order to get something done; he doesn’t say things thoughtlessly, that’s all there is to it."
For anybody that thinks it's fun, here is the text from Analects XIII/3 in simplified characters (honesty compels me to add that I know how to play with Chinese text but can't actually read it):
子路曰：“衛君 待子而為政，子將奚先？”子曰：“必也正名乎！”子路曰：“有是哉，子之迂也！奚其正？”子曰：“野哉由也！君子於其所不知，蓋闕如也。名 不正，則言不順；言不順，則事不成；事不成，則禮樂不興；禮樂不興，則刑罰不中；刑罰不中，則民無所措手足。故君子名之必可言也，言之必可行也。君子於其 言，無所苟而已矣。”
Our firm has been retained by Mr. Dumpty. His cause of action is the fact that your website misquotes him.
ReplyDeleteSpecifically:
“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that's all.”
Please rectify forthwith.