Saturday, August 10, 2013

Sixteen Scandals: Defiance


Story by Katrina Trinko in The Corner, in its entirety:
Steve King called for charities struggling to get 501 (c)(3) status to “defy the IRS.”
Both tea-party and pro-life groups have faced struggles in getting the IRS to give them tax-exempt status.
“If you’re a 501 (c)(3) and you’re afraid of the IRS, just go ahead and defy the IRS on that!” King declared during a speech at The Family Leader summit.
“I’ll stand there with you,” the Iowa congressman added. 
Leaving aside the question of whether "struggle" is the appropriate word for having to fill out kind of a lot of forms and lie about how you're really a social welfare organization and not involved in politics, and leaving aside the fact that many groups not affiliated with Tea Party or anti-choice movements have had to "struggle" in the same way, I want to know exactly what form this defiance, with Steve standing there, is going to take. Will they insist on paying the taxes they've been exempted from?

If Iran the Circus

Persian of the Circus. Jack Butler Yeats, via.
Amos Yadlin and Avner Golov in the New York Times:
But it would be dangerous to think that Iran’s proposal for negotiations alone would pave the way for a deal. What matters is not the talks but the outcome.
Classic Israeli diplomatic strategy: Never enter negotiations unless you can predetermine how they come out.*
the enrichment of uranium from a low level (3.5 percent to 19.75 percent) to weapons-grade level (90 percent) is only one of three dimensions of Iran’s nuclear strategy. A second dimension is [jump]

The Noodge Debate

Nurse. Irving Penn, 1951. Via Disdressed.
Shorter David Brooks, "The Nudge Debate", New York Times, August 8, 2013:
People do stupid stuff.
The government should make them stop.
But that would be liberal, wouldn't it?
What if they noodged them into stopping?
A nanny state, but a nice nanny.
A Mary Poppins state.
A Jewish Mary Poppins!
What's not to like?
I've used this picture before but can't find out when or where it comes from; I added it by mistake. It really belongs here though by some peculiar visual logic.

Friday, August 9, 2013

Extra cheap


Nonsense! If the bill was going to pay for people to "get hung" it would have gotten more Republican votes.

Cheap shots, with no kisses

Obama certainly has that same abashed stammer as Cooper's courteous encyclopedist in Ball of Fire (1941). But can McCain match Barbara Stanwyck for street wisdom? Not to mention legs!
A fine romance, my friend, this is:
Obama also had warm words for Sen. John McCain when Leno asked Obama about his “bromance” with the GOPer. “That’s how a classic romantic comedy goes,” he quipped. “You know, initially you’re not getting along and then you keep on bumping into each other.”

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Blame of Groans

Shorter Jonah Goldberg, "Excuse me? GOP to blame for Obamacare?", USA Today, August 5, 2013, and reprinted as "The Obamacare Blame Game" in NRO, August 8, because recycling's fine when the Market does it:
Where do they get off blaming Republicans for Obamacare's problems?
We only tried to destroy it, for heaven's sake! Not like we succeeded!
Bildungblog (February 2007) claimed to have spotted Goldberg as Lord Harkonnen in the film version of Dune.
No, really.
The Affordable Care Act — aka ObamaCare — is off to a very rocky start, and according to the law's biggest defenders, the blame falls squarely at the feet of Republicans.
(No links in the NRO version,  because hypertext is a secular humanist conspiracy to make you read something icky.)

The law's biggest defenders according to Jonah are the folks at ThinkProgress, who in fact blame Republicans not for a rocky start (since it hasn't started yet, for one thing) but for a "media narrative" about it, but let that pass.
...the fact that activists won't give up may be annoying to supporters of the law, but just talk to any one of them and they'll be the first to tell you that so far they've failed utterly. Similarly, asking the NFL to stay out of a bitter political controversy may be unseemly, but such actions haven't done anything to stop ObamaCare.
Well, then. It's not like attempted murder is some kind of crime, right?

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Obama derangement: The acute phase

Circus Elephant. Roger Hilton, 1973. From Animalarium.
Kevin D. Williamson at National Review tries to strike the magazine's old note of magisterial grandeur, or at least General Jack D. Ripper paranoia:
Conservatives have for years attempted to put our finger upon precisely why Barack Obama strikes us as queer in precisely the way he does. There is an alienness about him...

How come they call it intelligence?

I feel funny about suggesting that our August THREAT might have more to do with the NSA's harried public relations than with Al Qa'eda. I've been very wrong about this before, notably during the Clinton administration, when I couldn't believe what they were saying about this Osama bin Laden. It seemed to me so obvious that he was a comic book villain made up by the CIA to justify bombing Sudan or the FBI to justify rounding up Arabs. But of course he wasn't.


Still, it seems so odd that Ayman al-Zawahiri should be choosing this precise moment to be "chattering" over the Internet about his plans, which everyone agrees he normally doesn't do, just as the world is learning about the NSA's ability to listen in. Unless he wants them listening, of course.

And I've read enough cheap spy fiction to think of a scenario that works like that. Zawahiri's reading his Washington Post about Snowden, and he's wondering how this can be, that the devil Crusaders are allowing their wicked ways to be exposed like this, unless they want him, Zawahiri, to know about it, or to know more than he already suspects. He can't imagine this ridiculous nerd is simply telling people, on his own initiative, without being instantly assassinated, he must be a tool of the Yankees. Because maybe they're bluffing, pretending to have a capacity they don't actually have. So he decides to test it out, and tosses off an email  places a conference call to the boys in Yemen Somalia: "O my brothers, could you kindly stage a horrible big incident preferably involving a US embassy somewhere in the neighborhood, sometime this month? Or a consulate will do, just not Benghazi. What did you think of the season end of Game of Thrones? Let us know by the usual channels if there's anything we can get you. Your friend  Have a good one," etc. The usual channels being the couriers they normally use to bypass electronic eavesdropping.

So the NSA picks up on this startling development and gets all excited. Al Qa'eda's planning something! And pretty soon everybody's mobilized and terrorized and the embassies are all closed down and Dr. Evil up there is saying yup, I guess they can read my email monitor my phone all right.
“This was like a meeting of the Legion of Doom,” one U.S. intelligence officer told The Daily Beast, referring to the coalition of villains featured in the Saturday morning cartoon Super Friends. (Gawker, via Betty Cracker)
Of course in this case, ironically, the NSA will have done itself considerably more harm than Snowden did. But that's intelligence for you. Wonder why they call it that?

A-Rod and Real

David Brooks writes:
For a while, when I first started writing for the New York Times, I worried a lot about whether I was doing it right. After all, as official representative of Rightness on the op-ed page of the most important newspaper in the world, I was in the shoes of Bill Safire, a dazzling self-advertiser who had [jump]
"Wanting to see her big brother during his baseball game", Stephanie Collins, 2011. Smithonian. 

Monday, August 5, 2013

Scarizona

Image via Freedom's Phoenix.
Got involved in another stupid debate, this time at a dreadful site called Weasel Zipper where they were celebrating the news that the Virginia murder rate has gone down in spite of relaxed gun laws. I pointed out that murders committed in Virginia alone don't account for all the harm done by Virginia-sold weapons, citing statistics from Wall Street Journal on the contribution of out-of-state guns to New York crime.

Well, says my interlocutor,
Of course a good deal of the problem in New York is the difficulty that normal people have in obtaining firearms, keeping them, and using them without running afoul of various laws intended to prevent their legitimate use. Here in Arizona you can walk in to WalMart and get one, you don't need a "permit," and you don't need a concealed carry permit. If someone breaks into your house and you splatter their across the wall, your biggest problem will be getting the bloodstains out. Gun violence in which a citizen is murdered or wounded by a perp is, understandably, all but unheard of. Even perp on perp, gun violence is low.
Ah, yes, another clown who thinks the Bronx is still burning down. Not quite, pal. Even in spite of our horrid Big-Government gun control, things are pretty good in the Big Apple. As I noted,
Did you know gun death rate in NYC at 4.3 per 100,000 is one of the lowest in US? http://www.nypost.com/p/news/l...whereas Arizona is almost 16 per 100,000, one of the worst. http://www.azcentral.com/commu...
Game, set, and match, I think. 

Saturday, August 3, 2013

Dark deeds

John Gannam, The Conspirators, for Collier's Weekly, 1933. Via.
It seems Al Qa'eda is concerned that our NSA surveillance program won't survive the current controversy, and the leaders are anxious to get their voices on tape before it's too late, because history, or something like that, because
The United States intercepted electronic communications this week among senior operatives of Al Qaeda, in which the terrorists discussed attacks against American interests in the Middle East and North Africa, American officials said Friday....
It is unusual for the United States to come across discussions among senior Qaeda operatives about operational planning — through informants, intercepted e-mails or eavesdropping on cellphone calls. So when the high-level intercepts were collected and analyzed this week, senior officials at the C.I.A., State Department and White House immediately seized on their significance.
Isn't it odd. I thought when details of our intelligence-gathering system got leaked, the terrorists were supposed to take advantage of the leak to figure out ways of avoiding it. But instead they're acting as if being intercepted is what they've always longed for.

Although there is, the Times acknowledges, another possible explanation:
Some analysts and Congressional officials suggested Friday that emphasizing a terrorist threat now was a good way to divert attention from the uproar over the N.S.A.'s data-collection programs, and that if it showed the intercepts had uncovered a possible plot, even better.
What? What? Are they trying to say our sacred Pentagon could be using deception? Please, Mr. President, tell us it's not true! No, on second thought, maybe you should just keep quiet for a while. Let the State Department handle it.

Friday, August 2, 2013

Return of the Undead

Neocon Revival (the architectural style). Jatiyo Sangshad Bhaban, Dhaka, Bangladesh. From Wikipedia.

Shorter David Brooks, "The Neocon Revival", New York Times, August 2, 2013:
Don't you miss neoconservatism?
Don't you miss cheerful Irving Kristol?
Did you think neoconservatism was all about bombing Iraq?
Wrong! That was just a side issue.
Neoconservatism was all about getting people food stamps.
Small-government food stamps, natch.
From Sadly, No, June 2008.

Cheap shots: Fairly significantly overwrought

Hans Holbein the Younger, The Ambassadors, 1533.
Emo at the Guardian:

Or maybe laughing so hard they dropped one of the e's. Now they can't find it anywhere.
Dibble said she disagreed with the sentiments expressed by then-defense secretary Robert Gates in December 2010: "I've heard the impact of these releases on our foreign policy described as a meltdown, as a game-changer and so on. I think those descriptions are fairly significantly overwrought."
[jump]

Thursday, August 1, 2013

How we roll in NYC

How we roll in Vienna? Wiener dackerl. Via.
Anthony Weiner keeps sending me emails informing me "how we roll in New York City", and asking for money. I feel like replying, Anthony, you may roll, but you do not rock. Seriously, I cannot understand what he thinks he is accomplishing, unless his secret aim is to elect Christine Quinn, the stop-'n'-frisk candidate, by hiving off support for the progressives. Come to think of it, perhaps that is the purpose: maybe it's all Bloomberg's plan.

He has, however, explained that his nom de sexte, Carlos Danger, is not meant as an affront to the Spanish-speaking community—
“It was a joke in my personal life between me and one person,” he responded.
“I’m not gonna comment on anything about the information that that person has chosen to release,” he added. “They can do whatever they want. They can try to harm me in any way that they want. I’m moving forward talking about the people of the City of New York.”
Weiner has, meanwhile, received a celebrity endorsement from Jimmy McMillan, late of the The Rent is Too Damn High Party, who may be able to provide the nervous candidate with some much needed go-with-the-flow attitude. He certainly rolls and rocks both.
Via Politico.
My own candidate looks more and more like Bill de Blasio, recently blessed with an endorsement from a celebrity of his own, the radical hero and musical icon Harry Belafonte (who is in turn beset by a peculiar quarrel with an oddly antagonistic young person called Sean Carter, whom you may know more about than I do—I can't keep up with all this, but if young Sean endorses Weiner it will be clearer).
De Blasio and Belafonte. From The Grio (MSNBC).

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Privacy and the Private

Image from PlanetPOV.
I guess I have to say a couple of words about PFC Manning and his conviction on theft and espionage charges, but I'd rather wait until the sentencing to make it anything final. It's only today, as that phase begins, that we learn that the disclosure of the Afghan War Logs failed to produce any of the ghastly harm that was predicted, of identifying the Friends of America so that the Terrorists would be able to murder them all (there was one guy the Taliban killed, because, they said, of Wikileaks, but they were lying—he wasn't mentioned in the files). The worst General Robert Carr could say was:
Discussing the Guantanamo Bay Detainee Assessment Briefs (DABs), Carr suggested that the release of these documents was detrimental to the United States’ efforts to close the detention center, though he explained on cross-examination that the DABs could reveal that what the U.S. says publicly to some countries regarding transferring detainees back to their home countries and what we say to them privately could differ, obstructing that process. He testified, though, that he couldn’t speak to whether transferring the detainees was an administration priority.
Thanks, General Carr, for revealing to the opponents of closing Guantánamo what they need to do to slow that process down, if there's any way it could be any slower than it already is, because Manning and the Guardian didn't really make it clear. Now because of you Senator McConnell will be poring through the Guardian's database looking for evidence that he can use, and then calling the president of Yemen: "Mr. President, do you realize that what President Obama says in public about repatriating Yemeni prisoners is somewhat different than what he tells you in private?" What a massacre! We're putting you away for life, kid!

I just realized, if being detrimental to US efforts to close Guantánamo is harming our national interests, Senator McConnell must be one of the secret enemies that Manning allegedly helped out. Curiously enough, he's one of my enemies too. May I arrest him, please?
Image by TheSkunk.
Anyway, I'm in an awkward position, as I believe on the one hand that Manning performed a service to the country that, while it broke the law, deserved to be punished a whole lot less than it already has been and doesn't need to be punished any further; and on the other that this doesn't make Obama a war criminal. I'm starting to feel a little like one of those Evan Bayh types with the "Now just stop that, both of you!" Also I'm pretty sure that the whole discussion is a lot less important than poverty and injustice, and yet I feel like being in it all the time. Huh.

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

West of Eden: Washington

Image from Greenmarc Farms.
Why we hate the New York Times:

Article by Michael Gordon and Isabel Kershner with the headline,

Talks Begin on Mideast, to Doubts on All Sides

and then the doubts, for the first 16 paragraphs, are represented by a single source, convicted criminal Elliott Abrams. After which some other voices from "all sides" are heard, but none of them quite as doubtful as that. Abrams seems to think the purpose of the negotiations is [jump]

Monday, July 29, 2013

Simple answers to simple questions

Was a fetus before it became mainstream. Via
 Katy French for the Washington Examiner:
A baby is wanted. A "pregnancy tissue" isn't. But is the longing or lack thereof of one's mother truly an acceptable basis on which to confer or deny humanity?
Yes. 

Sunday, July 28, 2013

Foxy Lazy

Via Owen Greaves.
The Fox News religion correspondent, Lauren Green, stared with suspicious bewilderment at her interview subject, the historian Reza Aslan, on their air to promote his new book, Zealot, a study of the historical Jesus. "Why," she said, "would a Muslim want to write a book about Jesus?" As if it were an inexplicable perversity, something he couldn't possibly have thought up on his own.

He immediately went a little prickly but maintained his kind smile and even tone of voice, informing her that he was actually not simply a Muslim but a qualified scholar, with several degrees and an intimate familiarity with New Testament Greek, etc., etc., and that it [jump]

Saturday, July 27, 2013

The new party is the Surprise Party

Via The Inspiration Room.
News from Bernard Sanders (I-VT):
Sen. Bernie Sanders on Friday provided suggestions for tax reform to the Senate Finance Committee, Politico reported. Chairman Max Baucus and ranking member Orrin Hatch had asked for member input and offered to keep any suggestions secret for 50 years. Sanders declined the offer of secrecy, The Hill reported online. “Given the fact that my suggestions represent the interests of the middle class of this country and not powerful corporate special interests, I have no problem with making them public,” he said. LINK, LINK
 This is kind of amazing. As Bloomberg Businessweek remarks,
Tax negotiations, then—Congress’s basic constitutional responsibility—are to be held to the same standard of secrecy as the investigation of the Warren Commission.... [jump]

Friday, July 26, 2013

Sixteen Scandals: Missouri

If you Google something like "Central Missouri College Republicans Obama" you will get a lovely kind of picture of the right wing outrage wind machine getting into gear: [jump]